End times headlinesAtheist Richard Dawkins: “Any Fetus is Less Human Than...

Atheist Richard Dawkins: “Any Fetus is Less Human Than an Adult Pig”


- Advertisment -spot_img

“With respect to those meanings of ‘human’ that are relevant to the morality of abortion, any fetus is less human than an adult pig.” — A tweet from Richard Dawkins, echoing philosopher Peter Singer, who has made the same comparison.

Dawkins is probably the world’s most famous, or infamous, proponent of atheism, but a belief in atheism need not entail the pro-choice position on the ethics of abortion that Dawkins holds. Indeed, that position is contravened by science and reason accessible to people of any or no faith, independent of any religious teaching or texts. (See here prolifemn.blogspot.com.)

A clarification must be made regarding Dawkins’ use of the term “human.” It can be used in a biological sense to mean a living human organism—a member of the species Homo sapiens—and in that sense the fetus, from the beginning of his or her existence at conception, is a full-fledged human being, like you and me only at an earlier developmental stage, while the pig is not and never will be.

But Dawkins uses “human” in a different sense to refer to certain characteristically-human qualities that he considers morally relevant with respect to how a being ought to be treated—qualities that may not be possessed by all human beings (those who have yet to acquire them, or who have lost them, are excluded from serious moral regard) and that may be possessed by some non-human animals (such as pigs).

Dawkins went on to further discuss abortion and clarify his position. He considers the ability to experience pain the decisive factor: Only beings who can feel pain deserve the sort of moral respect that would preclude killing them. Only when an unborn child is developed enough to feel pain is abortion (presumably) morally impermissible.

But this position does not seem defensible. Surely we may not kill people as long as we do so in a painless fashion. So it must be, as Dawkins puts it, the ability to feel pain that counts.

But what about people who are under anesthesia or temporarily comatose? What about people with the condition called congenital insensitivity to pain? They cannot experience pain. Do they not still have a right to life? Imagine a person whose brain has been surgically altered to prevent the experience of pain.

Are these people not still people? Full Report

Bible Study
Join us on Facebook or Follow us on Twitter by clicking on the icons to get more updates. Have a question? Join our Forums and lets discuss. Consider sharing this article. It's that simple to spread the gospel. God bless you.


Latest news

In times like these, we need a savior

In times like these, we need a savior. We live in a world where speaking the truth will put...

Ellen White: The Final Movements WILL Be Rapid Ones

The United States Will Pass a Sunday Law Soon When our nation shall so abjure the principles of its...

No One Can Enter The Kingdom Of Heaven Except Through The Catholic Church — Says Vatican

“Daniel  7:25 And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of...

Chinese House Church Members Arrested for Listening to Foreign Pastor’s Audio Sermons

(Bitter Winter) — On June 19, over a dozen members of Fule Church, a place of worship that is...
- Advertisement -spot_imgspot_img

Brunei has made celebrating Christmas a criminal offence

Anyone found illegally celebrating Christmas in Brunei could face up to five years in prison, according to a reported...

Pope is right now working hand in hand with Islam to create one world religion

Bible prophecy fulfilling right before our eyes! Galatians 4:16 Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you...

Must read

In times like these, we need a savior

In times like these, we need a savior. We...

Ellen White: The Final Movements WILL Be Rapid Ones

The United States Will Pass a Sunday Law Soon...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you